![]() ![]() It’s just not always as strong as you want it to be in the real world with all the political, socioeconomic and racial realities of policing in America today. Yes, you have the right to say no, but it’s very difficult to say no to law enforcement authorities who want information about you, and their consent kind of falls apart. They can go ask through the system, they go through the anonymous consent system, or they could go knock on your door and say, “Hey, you have a camera, we’d like to know, would you mind consenting to us getting access?” It’s very hard to say no to that authority. It’s literally physically in front of them. ![]() I think that the use of police access could determine where police want to focus their resources, which of these neighborhoods filled with Ring cameras do they want to ask for information about? One of the things that I think people forget is that if you put the Ring doorbell on your door, police know it’s there. They might use the neighborhood apps to identify people who they think are “suspicious” or “don’t belong,” which can correlate, obviously, with difference in society. Can you give me some examples of what could go wrong here?įerguson: I think that the real privacy risks involve how consumers might use it to profile their own neighborhoods. There are, it sounds like, very real civil rights concerns - there have been all along - about racial profiling and other inequality concerns with the way that law enforcement might use this footage. Molly Wood: Talk to me about the risks in ways that law enforcement can use this footage. They are bringing the power of Amazon and their scale and their ability to do aggregated data collection, and really, their marketing abilities, to enter another space and provide another service. We have always felt a need to protect our homes, and Amazon has recognized that is a consumer interest, and it decided to disrupt yet another industry. The following is an edited transcript of our conversation.Īndrew Ferguson: In some ways, it’s not that different. I spoke with Andrew Ferguson, author of the book “The Rise of Big Data Policing: Surveillance, Race, and the Future of Law Enforcement.” I asked him how this is different from traditional security systems that involve police and other agencies. I talk about this in “Quality Assurance,” the segment where we take a closer look at a big tech story. Ed Markey, a Democrat from Massachusetts, asked Amazon to explain what happens to that video if police ask for it, and Amazon reported that there aren’t any rules - police can hold onto it indefinitely and share it with any agency they want. Amazon owns the Ring security camera company, and with the customer’s permission, the company will share footage from the camera with police. You can change these settings by clicking “Ad Choices / Do not sell my info” in the footer at any time.Doorbell security cameras are a hot item - and hot topic - when it comes to privacy and security. Please note that you will still see advertising, but it will not be personalised to you. You can choose not to receive personalised ads by clicking “Reject data collection and continue” below. Read more about how we personalise ads in the BBC and our advertising partners. When you consent to data collection on AMP pages you are consenting to allow us to display personalised ads that are relevant to you when you are outside of the UK. We use local storage to store your consent preferences on your device. Read more about the essential information we store on your device to make our web pages work. To make our web pages work, we store some limited information on your device without your consent. The lightweight mobile page you have visited has been built using Google AMP technology. You may be asked to set these preferences again when you visit non-AMP BBC pages.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |